Published on :

The British deputies of the House of Commons adopted, Tuesday evening, the bill on the internal market, which provides for possible derogations from the divorce agreement negotiated with the Europeans and ratified by both parties.

British MPs approved on Tuesday 29 September Boris Johnson’s government bill. He goes back in part to the Brexit agreement and angered Europeans, right in the final stretch of trade negotiations between London and the 27.

After their divorce at the start of the year, the two parties set themselves the goal of reaching a free trade agreement in October to avoid a potentially devastating “no deal” on January 1st.

Negotiations resumed on Tuesday in Brussels for a ninth round but the previous eight have failed to yield any major breakthroughs and tension escalated in September when Boris Johnson’s government introduced a bill contradicting the treaty governing their divorce.

>> Read: London publishes controversial Brexit deal bill

The text, which by London’s own admission violates international law, was approved in the evening at third reading by the deputies at 340 for and 256 against, paving the way for its consideration by the Lords in the weeks to come.

The green light comes as no surprise, given Boris Johnson’s overwhelming majority in the House of Commons, despite criticism from five former prime ministers and part of the ruling Tories.

Defending the territorial integrity of the United Kingdom

To appease the anger within its camp, the government had accepted an amendment giving more power to the Parliament to control the controversial provisions, without satisfying Brussels, which threatened a legal action for lack of withdrawal by the end of September. .

The text returns to certain provisions for the British province of Northern Ireland, planned to avoid the return of a border with the Republic of Ireland, a safeguard considered essential to the maintenance of peace on the island.

For Boris Johnson, the aim of the project is to defend the territorial integrity of the United Kingdom by ensuring the continuity of trade between Great Britain and the province of Northern Ireland.

>> To read: Brexit: the sticking points before the last round of negotiations

But for Europeans, it is a blow to mutual trust in the critical phase of negotiations on the future relationship, led by Michel Barnier on the European side and David Frost on the British side.

After a meeting on Monday with British Minister Michael Gove, European Commission Vice-President Maros Sefcovic ruled out that the subject could torpedo trade talks: “It will never be the EU that will bring about the end of negotiations on the future partnership “.

The series of talks, which began on Tuesday, is due to end on Friday, in the middle of a European summit in the Belgian capital. Negotiators hope to reach the negotiating “tunnel”, that time when an agreement seems close enough to engage in continuous closed-door talks.

An agreement to avoid the emergence of a deregulated economy

Time is running out: British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has set a date of October 15, the day of a European summit in Brussels, for an agreement. The Europeans have given themselves until the end of October.

In the absence of an agreement, a sudden break in trade would further shake economies already weakened by the new coronavirus pandemic.

The trade talks still stumble on several sensitive subjects, such as the “governance” of the future agreement, or the eternal question of the guarantees required by the EU in fiscal, social, environmental and especially State aid matters, to avoid to see the emergence of a deregulated economy on the other side of the Channel, which would compete with it unfairly.

An agreement must also be found on fishing, a particularly explosive subject for a handful of Member States like France, but also Spain, Denmark, Belgium or the Netherlands, which hope for a status quo in the access of their fishermen to British waters, very full of fish.

Several diplomats from other Member States – who have no interest in this subject – however judge the EU “too strict” on fishing, which they imagine as a possible adjustment variable with the United Kingdom.

“The partnership will be approved unanimously. We must therefore take into account the different interests of the other Member States and show solidarity. Having said that, the EU must be realistic …”, underlines one of them. .

With AFP

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *